119th Congress · HOUSE BILLINCORPORATED

H.R. 29Laken Riley Act

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to take into custody aliens who have been charged in the United States with theft, and for other purposes.

Immigration
Introduced Jan 3, 2025
Last action Feb 10, 2025
Pipeline · Bill → Law
Step 1
Introduced
Jan 3, 2025
Step 2
Referred
Jan 3, 2025
Judiciary
Step 3
Committee
Step 4
House floor
Jan 7, 2025
Passed House
Step 5
Senate
Feb 10, 2025
Step 6
Resolve Changes
Step 7
Signed
SummaryCRS Summary

This bill requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to detain certain non-U.S. nationals (aliens under federal law) who have been arrested for burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. The bill also authorizes states to sue the federal government for decisions or alleged failures related to immigration enforcement. Under this bill, DHS must detain an individual who (1) is unlawfully present in the United States or did not possess the necessary documents when applying for admission; and (2) has been charged with, arrested for, convicted of, or admits to having committed acts that constitute the essential elements of burglary, theft, larceny, or shoplifting. The bill also authorizes...

Provisions · 3 sectionsEngrossed in House
3 versions
Engrossed in House · 3 provisions
AmendmentAI
AmendmentAI
Similar Bills · 1 matches
BillText overlapStatus
S. 5Laken Riley Act
95%
ENACTED
Roll Call Votes · 1
Timeline · 12 actions
Feb 10, 2025
Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 10.
Feb 6, 2025
Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.
Jan 8, 2025
Received in the Senate.
Jan 7, 2025
Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 5.
Jan 7, 2025
DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 29.
Jan 7, 2025
The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
Jan 7, 2025
POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 29, the Chair put the question on passage of the bill and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Raskin demanded the yeas and nays and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
Jan 7, 2025
Considered as unfinished business.
Jan 7, 2025
On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 264 - 159 (Roll no. 6).ROLL CALLpass
Jan 7, 2025
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Jan 3, 2025
Introduced in House
Jan 3, 2025
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.